Why the study?
Do the calibrated apical A wave and its derivatives correlate with left ventricular pathology and the presence of a fourth heart sound in normal subjects and patients with heart disease?
Do the calibrated apical A wave and its derivatives correlate with left ventricular pathology and the presence of a fourth heart sound in normal subjects and patients with heart disease?
The calibrated apical A wave and its rate of rise are sensitive indicators of left ventricular compliance and strongly correlate with the presence of a fourth heart sound.
Apical A wave metrics may signal LV pathology and S4; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The amplitude of the calibrated apical A wave (A), its first derivative (dA/dt), its normalized first derivative ( [dA/dt]/A) and its value expressed as a percentage of the total systolic deflection (A/H) were derived from calibrated left apexcardiograms in 64 normal subjects and in 150 patients with heart disease. A is significantly increased in patients with pressure and volume overload of the left ventricle, in idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis, in congestive cardiomyopathy and in ischemic heart disease in the presence of left ventricular asynergy (p < 0.001). In aortic stenosis, A is more sensitive to changes in left ventricular com- pliance than the A/H ratio. Highly significant correlations exist between A and peak dA/dt in normals (r = 0.98) and in patients with heart disease (r = 0.81-0.99); at an identical A, patients with a dilated left ventricle have lower values for peak dA/dt and a lower index (peak dA/dt)/A (p < 0.001). As a result, A and peak dA/dt are considered to be primarily determined by the resistance to ventricular filling during atrial systole. In the presence of a fourth heart sound (S,), A and peak dA/dt were significantly increased (p < 0.001). A peak dA/dt value > 6X/sec is always associated with an S. To a certain degree peak dA/dt can differentiate between a physiologic and pathologic S4. The intensity of S4 depends more on the rate of rise of the A wave than on its total amplitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denef et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: