Key result
The ratio of total amplitude to diastolic wave on the apexcardiogram was significantly higher in patients with isolated aortic regurgitation (30%) compared to normal subjects (21%, P=0.01).
Why the study?
Does the ratio of total amplitude to diastolic wave on the apexcardiogram differ between normal subjects and patients with various cardiac lesions?
Observational
Does the ratio of total amplitude to diastolic wave on the apexcardiogram differ between normal subjects and patients with various cardiac lesions?
The ratio of total amplitude to diastolic wave on the apexcardiogram is a useful noninvasive parameter for assessing isolated aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis, and mitral insufficiency.
May support apexcardiogram ratio as noninvasive marker for isolated aortic regurgitation; leaves open broader diagnostic utility without prospective validation.
Utilizing the apexcardiogram, the ratio of total amplitude to the height of the total diastolic wave was determined. Compared with a mean (+/- 1 SD) value of 21 +/- 4% for normal subjects there were statistically significant differences in those patients with isolated aortic regurgitation (30 +/- 10%, P = 0.01), aortic stenosis (12 +/- 11%, P less than 0.025) and mitral insufficiency (14 +/- 8%, P less than 0.025). There were no significant changes of this ratio in subjects with combined aortic stenosis and insufficiency (24 +/- 9%, P less than 0.25), triple vessel coronary artery disease (19 +/- 7%, P less than 0.25) and mitral valve prolapse (23 +/- 10%, P less than 0.35). There was a trend for higher ratio values in patients with greater angiographic evidence of aortic insufficiency, but no correlation between the ratio and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. These alterations of the apexcardiogram accord with hemodynamic findings in the presence of each respective lesion. It is concluded that this ratio is useful for the noninvasive assessment of isolated aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis and mitral insufficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeSa’Neto et al. (1981) conducted an observational in Aortic Regurgitation and Other Cardiac Lesions. Ratio of total amplitude to diastolic wave on the apexcardiogram vs. Normal subjects was evaluated on Ratio of total amplitude to the height of the total diastolic wave (p=0.01). The ratio of total amplitude to diastolic wave on the apexcardiogram was significantly higher in patients with isolated aortic regurgitation (30%) compared to normal subjects (21%, P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: