Key result
External jugular venous pressure accurately estimates central venous pressure in mechanically ventilated surgical patients, with a mean difference of 0.3 mmHg (95% CI 4.1 to +3.5 mmHg).
Why the study?
Does external jugular venous pressure accurately estimate central venous pressure in mechanically ventilated surgical patients?
Observational (n=24)
Single-blind
Random order of measurements
Does external jugular venous pressure accurately estimate central venous pressure in mechanically ventilated surgical patients?
Effect estimate: Mean difference 0.3 mmHg (95% CI 4.1 to +3.5)
External jugular venous pressure provides an accurate estimate of central venous pressure in mechanically ventilated surgical patients, offering a potentially simpler monitoring site.
Supports external JVP as CVP surrogate in ventilated surgical patients; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
We compared central venous pressures, measured via a 150 mm triple lumen catheter in the internal jugular vein with simultaneous external jugular venous pressures, measured with a 5 mm cannula in the external jugular vein, in 24 patients undergoing major surgery. Patients were mechanically ventilated in the supine position. Six sets of paired measurements of mean central venous pressure and mean external jugular venous pressure were taken by a blinded observer, in random order and at end-expiration at 30-min intervals during surgery. Four patients were not studied because of a failure to cannulate the external jugular vein. The remaining 20 patients yielded 111 sets of paired measurements. The mean difference between external jugular venous pressure and central venous pressure was 0.3 mmHg over a range of central venous pressure of 0-22 mmHg. Limits of agreement were 3.6 to +3.0 mmHg (95% CI 4.1 to +3.5 mmHg). We conclude that external jugular venous pressure is an accurate estimate of central venous pressure in surgical patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery (n=24). External jugular venous pressure measurement vs. Central venous pressure measurement was evaluated on Agreement between external jugular and central venous pressures (Mean difference 0.3 mmHg, 95% CI 4.1 to +3.5). External jugular venous pressure accurately estimates central venous pressure in mechanically ventilated surgical patients, with a mean difference of 0.3 mmHg (95% CI 4.1 to +3.5 mmHg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: