Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Renal impairment (RI) is associated with worse prognosis. Recently, cystatin C has been shown to represent a potentially superior marker of the glomerular filtration rate compared with creatinine clearance (CrCl). We evaluated the impact of cystatin C and other markers of RI on prognosis in a large cohort of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Cystatin C, creatinine (Cr), and CrCl were determined at baseline in a cohort of 1033 patients (30-70 years) with CHD. Patients were followed for a mean of 33.5 months, and a combined endpoint [fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) events] was used as the outcome variable. Cystatin C was measured by immunonephelometry, and CrCl was calculated. RESULTS: During follow-up, 71 patients (6.9%) experienced a secondary CVD event. Neither Cr (P = 0.63) nor CrCl (P = 0.10) were associated with incidence of CVD events, whereas cystatin C was clearly associated with risk of secondary CVD events (P <0.0001). In multivariate analyses, patients in the top quintile of the cystatin C distribution at baseline had a statistically significantly increased risk of secondary CVD events even after adjustment for classic risk factors, severity of coronary disease, history of diabetes mellitus, treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and C-reactive protein (hazard ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.91) compared with patients in the bottom quintile. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the possibly important prognostic value of cystatin C among patients with known CHD and suggest that it may be a useful clinical marker providing complementary information to established risk determinants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Köenig et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: