Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study assessed the long-term predictive validity of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: Words and Sentences (CDI:WS; Fenson, Dale, Reznick, Thal, Bates, Hartung, Pethick & Reilly, 1993) for children's expressive and receptive vocabulary development. Sixty-one New Zealand children (31 females) were assessed with a New Zealand version of the CDI: WS at 1;7 and 2;1 and with the Expressive Vocabulary Test (Williams, 1997) and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III (Dunn & Dunn, 1997) at 2;8 and 3;4. Excellent reliability and good predictive validity was obtained for the NZ CDI:WS even over a 21-month delay. Predictive validity of the NZ CDI:WS for the PPVT-III was higher for children of mothers with less education. We discuss the implications of these results for use of the CDI:WS with children from a broad range of cultural and educational backgrounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reese et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: