Key result
Transmastoid galvanic vestibular stimulation provoked a transient reduction in heart rate in both seated and standing positions, whereas unilateral stimulation only decreased heart rate when seated.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the heart rate effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation persists after provoking a sympathetic response and if this response differs between unilateral and transmastoid stimulation.
Does unilateral or transmastoid galvanic vestibular stimulation affect heart rate and heart rate variability during postural changes in healthy humans?
Does unilateral or transmastoid galvanic vestibular stimulation affect heart rate and heart rate variability during postural changes in healthy humans?
Transmastoid galvanic vestibular stimulation provokes a transient reduction in heart rate that persists even during standing, resembling parasympathetic cardiac function.
Hypothesis-generating for vestibular-parasympathetic coupling in posture; leaves open clinical relevance in autonomic disorders.
The study of cardiovascular function with galvanic vestibular stimulation has provided evidence on the neural structures that are involved in the vestibulo-autonomic reflex. This study determined if the effect on heart rate using galvanic vestibular stimulation persists after provoking a sympathetic response and if this response differs when using unilateral or transmastoid (bilateral) stimulation. We analysed heart rate and heart rate variability using unilateral and transmastoid galvanic vestibular stimulation combined with cardiovascular reflex evoked by postural change in 24 healthy human subjects. Three electrode configurations were selected for unilateral stimulation considering the anatomical location of each semicircular canal. We compared recordings performed in seated and standing positions, and with unilateral and transmastoid stimulation. With subjects seated, a significant transient decrease in heart rate was observed with unilateral stimulation. With transmastoid stimulation, heart rate decreased in both seated and standing positions. Average intervals between normal heartbeats recorded with stimulation resemble parasympathetic cardiac function induced by auricular vagal nerve stimulation. Our results indicate that unilateral stimulation does not eliminate the natural heart rate increase caused by orthostatic hypotension. In contrast, transmastoid stimulation provoked a transient reduction in heart rate, even when subjects were standing. These responses should be considered while performing experiments with galvanic vestibular stimulation and subsequent effects in cardiac regulation mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pliego‐Carrillo et al. (2021) studied Healthy humans (n=24). Unilateral and transmastoid galvanic vestibular stimulation vs. Seated and standing positions was evaluated on Heart rate and heart rate variability. Transmastoid galvanic vestibular stimulation provoked a transient reduction in heart rate in both seated and standing positions, whereas unilateral stimulation only decreased heart rate when seated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: