Key result
Tissue Doppler imaging parameters Sa and Sm did not significantly correlate with left ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic stress, or stroke volume in subjects without overt heart disease.
Why the study?
Do tissue Doppler imaging parameters (Sa and Sm) correlate with left ventricular load, mass, and stroke volume in subjects without overt cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=87)
Do tissue Doppler imaging parameters (Sa and Sm) correlate with left ventricular load, mass, and stroke volume in subjects without overt cardiovascular disease?
Tissue Doppler imaging parameters Sa and Sm do not correlate with LV load or stroke volume and should not replace established parameters of systolic function like stress-corrected midwall shortening in resting subjects without overt heart disease.
Sa and Sm should not yet replace established systolic indices in subjects without overt disease; hypothesis-generating for their load-independent utility.
AIMS: To evaluate whether the peak systolic velocities of the displacement of the lateral mitral anulus (Sa) and of the mid-portion of the interventricular septal wall (Sm) correlate with measures of left ventricular load, left ventricular mass, and Doppler stroke volume in normotensive and hypertensive subjects without clinically overt cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tissue Doppler imaging was used to evaluate Sa and Sm in apical 4-chamber view; standard echocardiographic procedures were used to assess left ventricular structure and traditional parameters of systolic function (ejection fraction, stress-corrected midwall shortening, meridional and circumferential end-systolic stress); pulsed Doppler was employed to evaluate stroke volume. In 87 subjects meeting inclusion criteria, Sa and Sm were not significantly correlated either with left ventricular end-diastolic volume and end-systolic stress, or with stroke volume; in contrast, endocardial and midwall fractional shortening were lower with higher afterload, as expected. Fractional shortening at endocardium and midwall, and Sm were lower with higher left ventricular mass. Mean Sa and Sm values were lower in subjects with low vs. those with normal stress-corrected midwall shortening, but low Sa was not associated with lower stress-corrected midwall shortening in our study sample. CONCLUSIONS: While Sa and Sm might be indices of longitudinal left ventricular systolic mechanics, they should not be considered as measures of left ventricular contractility alternative to well-established parameters of systolic function, such as stress-corrected midwall shortening, in subjects at rest without overt heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palmieri et al. (2005) conducted a cross-sectional in Normotensive and hypertensive subjects without clinically overt cardiovascular disease (n=87). Tissue Doppler imaging (Sa and Sm) vs. Standard echocardiographic parameters was evaluated on Correlation of Sa and Sm with left ventricular load, mass, and Doppler stroke volume. Tissue Doppler imaging parameters Sa and Sm did not significantly correlate with left ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic stress, or stroke volume in subjects without overt heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: