Key result
Nocturnal wrist acceleration measurements yielded significantly higher phase synchronization to respiratory flow compared to standard ECG-derived respiration proxies (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Assessing breathing signals without direct respiratory sensors can be helpful for screening and large cohort studies.
Does wrist accelerometer-derived respiration improve phase synchronization with flow-derived respiration compared to ECG-derived respiration in subjects undergoing sleep studies?
Observational (n=223)
No
Does wrist accelerometer-derived respiration improve phase synchronization with flow-derived respiration compared to ECG-derived respiration in subjects undergoing sleep studies?
Wrist accelerometer data provides significantly better respiration proxies than standard ECG-derived methods during sleep, offering a reliable, non-obtrusive method for respiratory monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wrist accelerometers may improve nocturnal respiration monitoring in sleep studies; leaves open prospective validation for clinical use.
Respiratory rate and changes in respiratory activity provide important markers of health and fitness. Assessing the breathing signal without direct respiratory sensors can be very helpful in large cohort studies and for screening purposes. In this paper, we demonstrate that long-term nocturnal acceleration measurements from the wrist yield significantly better respiration proxies than four standard approaches of ECG (electrocardiogram) derived respiration. We validate our approach by comparison with flow-derived respiration as standard reference signal, studying the full-night data of 223 subjects in a clinical sleep laboratory. Specifically, we find that phase synchronization indices between respiration proxies and the flow signal are large for five suggested acceleration-derived proxies with [Formula: see text] for males and [Formula: see text] for females (means ± standard deviations), while ECG-derived proxies yield only [Formula: see text] for males and [Formula: see text] for females. Similarly, respiratory rates can be determined more precisely by wrist-worn acceleration devices compared with a derivation from the ECG. As limitation we must mention that acceleration-derived respiration proxies are only available during episodes of non-physical activity (especially during sleep).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leube et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Sleep disorders (n=223). Wrist accelerometer-derived respiration proxies vs. ECG-derived respiration proxies was evaluated on Phase synchronization index (γ) with respiratory flow (p=<0.001). Nocturnal wrist acceleration measurements yielded significantly higher phase synchronization to respiratory flow compared to standard ECG-derived respiration proxies (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: