Why the study?
Does the combination of femoral artery flow velocity parameters and segmental pressure measurements accurately diagnose hemodynamically significant aorto-iliac disease in patients evaluated for aorto-iliac disease?
Does the combination of femoral artery flow velocity parameters and segmental pressure measurements accurately diagnose hemodynamically significant aorto-iliac disease in patients evaluated for aorto-iliac disease?
The combination of femoral artery decay time and upper thigh/arm pressure index provides a simple, accurate non-invasive screening method to confirm or rule out aorto-iliac disease.
May support combined decay time and pressure ratio for aorto-iliac screening; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation.
Three different femoral artery flow velocity parameters in combination with segmental pressure measurements were evaluated for their respective diagnostic value in identifying the presence or absence of hemodynamically significant aorto-iliac disease. A total of 60 patients (119 legs) were examined both non-invasively and with arteriography. Doppler flow velocities were recorded using a 5-MHz CW Doppler velocity metering system. Of the three parameters used (peak velocity, decay time and deceleration), a decay time of 220 ms yielded the most practical discriminant value. The accuracy increases when in addition the upper thigh/arm pressure ratio values are considered. The results indicate that the combination of femoral artery decay time with the upper thigh/arm pressure index provides a simple and accurate non-invasive screening method to confirm or rule out aorto-iliac disease. This helps to determine whether the patient is a candidate for arteriography and for potential surgical intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fronek et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: