Why the study?
Does the ACCESS cTnI immunoassay accurately diagnose myocardial infarction compared to Stratus cTnI and CK-MB mass in patients with suspected MI?
Does the ACCESS cTnI immunoassay accurately diagnose myocardial infarction compared to Stratus cTnI and CK-MB mass in patients with suspected MI?
The ACCESS cTnI immunoassay provides comparable sensitivity and specificity to CK-MB mass and Stratus cTnI assays for diagnosing myocardial infarction within 12 hours of symptom onset.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ACCESS cTnI for suspected MI diagnosis; cross-sectional data leave open prospective validation in current algorithms.
We evaluated the ACCESS cardiac troponin I (cTnI) immunoassay as a marker for myocardial infarction (MI). Total imprecision was 6.0% to 13.5%, the minimum detectable concentration was 0.007 microg/L, and the limit of quantitation was 0.046 microg/L. Comparison of cTnI measurement between the ACCESS and Stratus systems (n = 114) showed a proportional difference: ACCESS cTnI = 0.0996 Stratus cTnI + 0.049 microg/L (r = 0.811). Fifty-nine of 61 ambulatory patients without cardiac symptoms had no detectable cTnI (95% range, 0.00 to 0.025 microg/L). The optimum cutoff for discriminating MI (n = 289, 45 with MI) was 0.15 microg/L by receiver operator characteristic curve analysis; at this cutoff, the ACCESS cTnI assay showed a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% CI, 79.7-98.1%) and specificity of 91.8% (95% CI, 88.4-95.2%). The ACCESS cTnI assay results showed 89.4% and 93.0% concordance with the MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB) mass and Stratus cTnI results, respectively, for classification of patients with suspected MI. The ACCESS cTnI assay appears to show sensitivity and specificity comparable with those of both CK-MB mass and Stratus cTnI assays for the diagnosis of MI in patients presenting within 12 h of onset of symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christenson et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: