Key result
Continuous heart rate monitoring during 6MWT showed that heart rate expenditure per distance decreased significantly after adding vasodilator therapy (median difference 23%, p=0.0001).
Why the study?
Although the 6MWT indirectly measures RV function during exercise in PAH, changes in walk distance can be confounded by effort and musculoskeletal disease.
Does continuous heart rate monitoring to calculate HRE/d improve clinical assessment during the 6-minute walk test in patients with PAH?
Observational (n=36)
Does continuous heart rate monitoring to calculate HRE/d improve clinical assessment during the 6-minute walk test in patients with PAH?
Absolute Event Rate: 23% vs -0.79%
p-value: p=0.0001
Continuous heart rate monitoring during the 6-minute walk test to calculate HRE/d provides valuable physiologic data that enhances test reproducibility and detects clinical changes better than walk distance alone in PAH patients.
Right ventricular (RV) function is a predictor of outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The 6‐min walk test (6MWT) is likely an indirect measure of RV function during exercise, but changes in absolute walk distance can also be influenced by factors like effort and musculoskeletal disease. Paired 6MWT with continuous electrocardiogram monitoring was performed in stable PAH patients, patients adding PAH therapies, and healthy controls. Heart rate expenditure (HRE) was calculated (integrating pulse during 6MWT) and then divided by walk distance (HRE/d). We also evaluated changes in peak heart rate, time above age‐adjusted maximum predicted heart rate, and heart rate at 6 min. HRE/d was compared to invasive hemodynamic measures in patients who had right heart catheterization performed within seven days, WHO functional class assessment, and Emphasis 10 questionnaire. We measured two 6MWT in 15 stable PAH patients, 13 treatment intensification patients, and 8 healthy controls. HRE/d was reproducible in the stable PAH group (median difference, −0.79%), while it decreased (median difference, 23%, p = 0.0001) after adding vasodilator therapy. In 11 patients with right heart catheterization, HRE/d correlated strongly with stroke volume, r = −0.72, p = 0.01. Peak heart rate decreased after adding vasodilator therapy. HRE/d also correlated with WHO functional class and Emphasis 10 score. Continuous heart rate monitoring during 6MWT provides valuable physiologic data accounting for effort. HRE/d appears to enhance test reproducibility in stable patients while detecting change after adding therapy as compared to walk distance alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lachant et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (n=36). Continuous electrocardiogram monitoring during 6MWT vs. Walk distance alone was evaluated on Heart rate expenditure divided by walk distance (HRE/d) (p=0.0001). Continuous heart rate monitoring during 6MWT showed that heart rate expenditure per distance decreased significantly after adding vasodilator therapy (median difference 23%, p=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: