Why the study?
Does a cholesterol-enriched diet impair endothelium-dependent relaxation in coronary resistance arteries of rabbits?
Does a cholesterol-enriched diet impair endothelium-dependent relaxation in coronary resistance arteries of rabbits?
Hypercholesterolemia induces endothelial dysfunction in coronary resistance arteries, leading to paradoxical contraction rather than relaxation in response to endothelium-dependent vasodilators.
Endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolemic rabbits warrants no clinical practice change; leaves open translation to human coronary arteries.
The endothelium-dependent contractile responses of subepicardial coronary resistance arteries (286 +/- 18 microns ID, n = 22) from rabbits fed either a 0.5 or 2.0% cholesterol-enriched diet or a control diet for 10-12 wk were determined under isometric conditions at the optimum length for active force production (Lo). After the development of tone with 29 mM K+-Krebs, arteries from control rabbits treated with acetylcholine (0.1-10 microM) showed a concentration-dependent relaxation, with a maximum decrease in tone of 63%. In contrast, coronary arteries from animals fed 0.5 and 2.0% cholesterol contracted to acetylcholine (approximately 210% increase in tone). A similar phenomenon was seen with arteries precontracted with 10 nM 9,11-methanoepoxy-prostaglandin H2 (U 46,619), a thromboxane A2 mimetic. The contractile responses to acetylcholine occurred in arteries in which the endothelium was structurally intact and which were devoid of plaque. Arteries from cholesterol-fed animals were poorly responsive to ADP (0.01-10.0 microM), whereas arteries from normal animals relaxed. All arteries relaxed to an equal degree when exposed to acidified nitrite, which produces nitric oxide (NO). The data suggest that as a result of hypercholesterolemia, there may be a dysfunction in the synthesis or release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) by the endothelial cells of coronary resistance arteries, rather than an abnormality of the smooth muscle cells per se.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osborne et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: