Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 1, 1991StrokeOpen Access

Deriving clinical prediction rules from stroke outcome research.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DHDaniel B. HierMissouri University of Science and TechnologyGEGerald EdelsteinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Systematic review reveals methodological limitations in stroke outcome literature, indicating major hurdles in establishing clinical prediction rules.

Key Points

  • Determine whether published stroke outcome research provides adequate methodological data to derive valid clinical prediction rules.
  • Systematic review evaluating 92 published articles on stroke outcome research for their suitability in creating clinical prediction rules.
  • Methodological deficiencies across reviewed studies prevented direct implementation of findings into practical clinical prediction models.
  • Effective rule derivation requires reporting patient demographics, standardized predictor and outcome definitions, mechanism-based patient stratification, adequate sample sizes, and mathematical details including beta coefficients and cutpoints.

Cite This Study

Hier et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc2b001af05bf0da8ea8dhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.22.11.1431
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Long-term prognosis of patients with lacunar syndromes1986 · 35 citations
  2. 2Outcome 1 year after SAH from cerebral aneurysm1984 · 239 citations
  3. 3Computerized tomography and prognosis in early aneurysm surgery1986 · 60 citations
  4. 4Cerebellar infarction: natural history, prognosis, and pathology.1987 · 185 citations
  5. 5Prognosis in subarachnoid hemorrhage of unknown etiology1986 · 111 citations