Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: The relationship between parity and health outcomes has been debated in the scientific literature in terms of ‘selection-pressure’. However, no previous review has raised the impacts of parity on spirometric parameters. This Systematic Review aimed to review the impacts of parity on spirometric parameters.Areas covered: PubMed and Scopus were searched on October 1st, 2020, using the combination of the following two medical subject headings: ‘Parity’ and ‘Respiratory Function Tests’. Only original articles published in English/French were retained. Ten studies investigated the impacts of parity on spirometric parameters: six included healthy females, three involved unhealthy females [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, defect in protease inhibitor, and some other conditions] and one included a mixed population of healthy/unhealthy females. The studies reported conflicting results: no impact, positive impact (multiparity is associated with larger forced-expiratory-volume in one second, forced- and slow- vital-capacity, and inspiratory-capacity), or negative impact (multiparous females has lower bronchial flows, higher static volumes, an accelerated lung-aging, a tendency to an obstructive-ventilatory-defect and/or to lung-hyperinflation, and increased protease inhibitor levels).Expert opinion: The ten studies presented some limitations that made data interpretation relatively difficult. Future research to identify the ‘real’ impact of parity on spirometric parameters are therefore encouraged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Triki et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: