Experimental evaluation demonstrates enhanced millimeter-wave signal focusing through transparent window glass, indicating viable building integration for indoor wireless networks.
Millimeter-wave signals experience substantial path loss when penetrating common building materials, hindering seamless indoor coverage from outdoor networks. To address this limitation, we present the 28-GHz “Meta-Window”, a mass-producible, visible transparent device designed to enhance millimeter-wave signal focusing. Fabricated via metal sputtering and etching on a standard soda-lime glass substrate, the meta-window incorporates subwavelength metallic structures arranged in a rotating pattern based on the Pancharatnam–Berry phase principle, enabling 0–360° phase control within the 25–32 GHz frequency band. A 210 mm × 210 mm prototype operating at 28 GHz was constructed using a 69 × 69 array of metasurface unit cells, leveraging planar electromagnetic lens principles. Experimental results demonstrate that the meta-window achieves greater than 20 dB signal focusing gain between 26 and 30 GHz, consistent with full-wave electromagnetic simulations, while maintaining up to 74.93% visible transmittance. This dual transparency—for both visible light and millimeter-wave frequencies—was further validated by a communication prototype system exhibiting a greater than 20 dB signal-to-noise ratio improvement and successful demodulation of a 64-QAM single-carrier signal (1 GHz bandwidth, 28 GHz) with an error vector magnitude of 4.11%. Moreover, cascading the meta-window with a reconfigurable reflecting metasurface antenna array facilitates large-angle beam steering; stable demodulation (error vector magnitude within 6.32%) was achieved within a ±40° range using the same signal parameters. Compared to conventional transmissive metasurfaces, this approach leverages established glass manufacturing techniques and offers potential for direct building integration, providing a promising solution for improving millimeter-wave indoor penetration and coverage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: