Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bushenjiangya-optimized granule on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients.
Does Bushenjiangya-optimized (BSJYO) granule improve left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients?
Does Bushenjiangya-optimized (BSJYO) granule improve left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients?
Bushenjiangya-optimized granule added to standard western medicine significantly improved echocardiographic markers of diastolic dysfunction and TCM symptom scores in hypertensive patients.
Supports adjunctive BSJYO for hypertensive LVDD; extends RCT evidence on TCM in cardiology.
Objective . The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bushenjiangya‐optimized (BSJYO) granule on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in hypertensive (HTN) patients. Methods . 120 patients diagnosed with HTN plus LVDD were randomly assigned to the BSJYO granule group and placebo group, and all patients received basal western medicine (WM) treatment. After eight weeks of treatment, we evaluated echocardiography, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndromes, 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure, liver and kidney functions, and adverse events. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were collected at 6‐month follow‐up. Results . Compared with pretreatment, E/Ea (Doppler‐derived index of filling pressure and worsening LVDD) significantly decreased significantly after 8 weeks of treatment in the BSJYO granule plus basal WM group (10.52 ± 1.87 vs. 9.49 ± 1.49, P < 0.01), alongside reductions in significantly effective response (SER), effective response (ER), and total effective response (TER = SER + ER) in TCM symptom scores (21.59% vs. 71.70%, P < 0.01). There were no differences between treatment groups in kidney and liver function, early adverse events, or MACE. Conclusion . BSJYO granule plus basal WM is an effective and safe therapy for HTN patients with LVDD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: