Why the study?
Novel ischemic electrocardiographic changes may help identify the culprit coronary vessel in NSTEMI, but their predictive value in patients referred for early invasive treatment needed determination.
Do novel ischemic electrocardiographic changes (N-wave, T-wave precordial instability) predict the culprit coronary artery in patients with NSTEMI referred for early invasive treatment?
Do novel ischemic electrocardiographic changes (N-wave, T-wave precordial instability) predict the culprit coronary artery in patients with NSTEMI referred for early invasive treatment?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The presence of an N-wave in lead aVL or T-wave precordial instability on ECG can help identify the left circumflex or obtuse marginal as the culprit artery in patients with NSTEMI.
BACKGROUND: Recently, novel ischemic electrocardiographic changes have been described, which may be clinically significant in the identification of the culprit coronary vessel in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We sought to determine the predictive value of N-wave, T-wave precordial instability, de-Winter ST/T-wave complex, and inferolateral myocardial infarction in the identification of the culprit artery in patients with NSTEMI referred for early invasive (<24 h) treatment. METHODS: A total of 148 patients with NSTEMI, aged 40-91 years, were enrolled from a cohort of 510 consecutive NSTEMI subjects, hospitalized in our center in 2015-2017. RESULTS: Of the evaluated ischemic ECG changes, the most common finding in patients with culprit left circumflex (LCx)/obtuse marginal artery or right coronary artery was T-wave precordial instability (28.3 and 13.5%, respectively), whereas in individuals with culprit left anterior descending/diagonal artery, T-wave precordial instability and N-wave in leads II, III or aVF occurred equally often (16.0%). A significant relationship was found between the occurrence of N-wave in inferolateral leads and culprit LCx/obtuse marginal. In multivariable analysis, N-wave in lead aVL [odds ratio (OR) 2.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-3.81], and T-wave precordial instability (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.02-2.41) were independent predictors of culprit LCx/obtuse marginal. The accuracy of N-wave in lead aVL in predicting the culprit LCx/obtuse marginal was 73.9% and was higher than the accuracy of T-wave precordial instability, which was 69.1%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTEMI referred for early invasive treatment, the presence of N-wave or T-wave precordial instability may be of greater clinical importance in the prediction of culprit LCx/obtuse marginal than classic ischemic changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rostoff et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: