Why the study?
Do PPG-based wearable heart rate monitors accurately estimate heart rate compared to reference ECG in healthy volunteers during exercise?
Do PPG-based wearable heart rate monitors accurately estimate heart rate compared to reference ECG in healthy volunteers during exercise?
Commercially available PPG-based wearable heart rate monitors demonstrate moderate reliability compared to ECG, with performance depending on activity type, sensor type, and device placement.
Wearables show only moderate exercise HR accuracy; leaves open need for validation before clinical or research reliance.
Wearable monitoring of heart rate (HR) during physical activity and exercising allows real time control of exercise intensity and training effect. Recently, technologies based on pulse plethysmography (PPG) have become available for personal health management for consumers. However, the accuracy of these monitors is poorly known which limits their application. In this study, we evaluated accuracy of two PPG based (wrist i.e. Mio Alpha vs forearm i.e. Schosche Rhythm) commercially available HR monitors during exercise. 21 healthy volunteers (15 male and 6 female) completed an exercise protocol which included sitting, lying, walking, running, cycling, and some daily activities involving hand movements. HR estimation was compared against values from the reference electrocardiogram (ECG) signal. The heart rate estimation reliability scores for <;5% accuracy against reference were following: mio Alpha 77,83% and Scosche Rhytm 76,29%. The estimated results indicate that performance of devices depends on various parameters, including specified activity, sensor type and device placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parák et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: