Why the study?
Atrial tachycardia/fibrillation episodes are common in ICD recipients and can be undetected by standard single-chamber devices, prompting investigation into whether a single-lead ICD with an atrial dipole improves AT/AF diagnosis and management.
Does a single-lead ICD with an atrial dipole improve the diagnosis of new-onset atrial arrhythmias compared to a standard single-chamber ICD in patients without a history of atrial arrhythmias?
Does a single-lead ICD with an atrial dipole improve the diagnosis of new-onset atrial arrhythmias compared to a standard single-chamber ICD in patients without a history of atrial arrhythmias?
In patients receiving a single-chamber ICD, a device with an atrial dipole significantly increased the detection of new-onset atrial arrhythmias compared to a standard device, though it did not significantly increase the initiation of oral anticoagulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May increase new atrial arrhythmia detection with dipole single-lead ICDs without raising anticoagulation starts; leaves open effects on outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial tachycardia/fibrillation (AT/AF) episodes are common in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients and can be undetected by standard single-chamber devices. This study aims to explore whether a single-lead ICD with an atrial dipole (ICD DX; BIOTRONIK SE & Co, Berlin, Germany) could improve the AT/AF diagnosis and management as compared to standard ICD (ICD VR). METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected patients without AT/AF history from the THINGS registry which included consecutive patients implanted with ICD for standard indications. The ICD VR and the ICD DX groups included 236 (62.8%) and 140 (37.2%) patients, respectively, and had no significant differences in baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 27 months, there were 7 AT/AF diagnoses in the ICD VR and 18 in the ICD DX group. The 2-year incidence of AT/AF diagnosis was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6%-9.6%) for the ICD VR and 11.4% (95% CI: 6.8%-18.9%) for the ICD DX group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 3.85 [95% CI: 1.58-9.41]; P = .003). Initiation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) due to AT/AF diagnosis was reported in 15 patients. The 2-year incidence of OAC onset was 3.6% (95% CI: 1.6%-7.8%) for the ICD VR and 6.3% (95% CI: 3.0%-12.7%) for ICD DX group (adjusted HR: 1.99 [95% CI: 0.72-5.56]; P = .184). CONCLUSION: We observed that atrial sensing capability in single-chamber ICD patients without evidence of atrial arrhythmias at implant is associated with a greater likelihood of detecting AT/AF episodes. The management of these diagnosed arrhythmias often led to clinical interventions, mainly represented by initiation of OAC therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biffi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: