Why the study?
Does candesartan improve exercise tolerance compared to verapamil in patients with mild diastolic dysfunction and a hypertensive response to exercise?
Does candesartan improve exercise tolerance compared to verapamil in patients with mild diastolic dysfunction and a hypertensive response to exercise?
In patients with mild diastolic dysfunction and exercise-induced hypertension, angiotensin II receptor blockade with candesartan improves exercise tolerance and quality of life, whereas calcium channel blockade with verapamil does not.
Candesartan may be preferred to verapamil for exercise tolerance in mild diastolic dysfunction; extends ARB benefits beyond BP reduction alone.
Diastolic dysfunction may be exacerbated by increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise. Ang II may contribute to this process. We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover study of two weeks of candesartan (16 mg) and verapamil (SR 160 mg). The 21 subjects were 64 +/- 10 years old with ejection fraction greater than 50%, no ischemia, mitral flow velocity E/A less than 1, normal resting SBP (< 150 mm Hg), and SBP greater than 200 mm Hg during exercise. Exercise tolerance was assessed using a Modified Bruce Protocol at baseline and after each two-week treatment period, separated by a two-week washout period. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. During exercise, Ang II levels increased from 29 +/- 18 to 33 +/- 18 pg/ml (P < 0.05). SBP during exercise was 213 +/- 9 mm Hg at baseline and similarly reduced by candesartan (198 +/- 18, P < 0.01) and verapamil (197 +/- 14, P < 0.01). With candesartan, exercise time increased from 793 +/- 182 seconds to 845 +/- 163 seconds (P < 0.05), and QOL improved from 11 +/- 14 to 5 +/- 6 (P < 0.05). In contrast, verapamil did not significantly improve exercise time or QOL. In patients with mild diastolic dysfunction at rest and a hypertensive response to exercise, both Ang II receptor blockade and verapamil blunted the hypertensive response to exercise. Ang II blockade increased exercise tolerance and improved QOL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Little et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: