A Test of Media-Centered Agenda Setting: Newspaper Content and Public Interests in a Presidential Election

Abstract The conventional wisdom in political communications research is that the media play a dominant role in defining the agenda of elections. In Bernard Cohen's words, the media do not tell us what to think, but they tell us what to think about. The present article challenges this conclusion. We present data on media coverage of the 1992 presidential election from the first nationally representative sample of American newspapers and compare these to the issue interests of the American public. We conclude that past claims that the media control the agenda-setting process have been overstated. Candidates messages are well represented in press coverage of the campaign, and coverage is even independent of a newspaper's editorial endorsement. We argue that agenda setting is a transaction process in which elites, the media, and the public converge to a common set of salient issues that define a campaign. Keywords: Agenda Setting Bush Campaign Candidate Agenda Setting Clinton Campaign Editorial Endorsement, Impact Of Journalist Agenda Setting Election Press Coverage Media Agenda Perot Campaign Public Agenda