Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background This study aimed at an initial validation of the Working Alliance Inventory for Education (WAI-EDU), an instrument to assess student–teacher relationship (STR). Methods The WAI-EDU was derived from the original Working Alliance Inventory to fit the context of higher education. Following a pre-test, the tool was applied to two different study settings. In the first study part, 81 clinical students completed the WAI-EDU at baseline, after 1 h (t1), and after 1 w (t2), to assess reliability. For comparison, a visual analogue scale (VAS) was also used to evaluate STR. In the second study part, 60 preclinical students completed the WAI-EDU at baseline and at a follow-up after 1 week of intensive education. Cronbach’s α , Pearson correlation coefficient, and Mann–Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis. Results Cronbach’s α of the WAI-EDU was higher than 0.9 at each time point in the cohort of 81 students. The test–retest-reliability was highest between baseline and t1 ( r = 0.928). Even between baseline and t2, and between t1 and t2, values higher than r = 0.8 were determined. In addition, the WAI-EDU correlated with VAS scales for strength ( r = 0.627, p < 0.01) and quality of STR ( r = 0.596, p < 0.01). After 1 week of teaching in the second cohort ( n = 60), a significantly higher WAI-EDU sum score was revealed (47.43 ± 7.46 vs. 40.73 ± 8.08, p < 0.01). During 1 week of education, similar to the WAI-EDU results, the VAS values for STR increased significantly ( p < 0.01). Conclusion The WAI-EDU demonstrated robust reliability and validity in measuring STR. These findings suggest that the WAI-EDU is a promising tool for evaluating STR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmalz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: