Why the study?
The effects of exercise on MDA-LDL and anti-MDA-LDL antibodies are poorly understood, and whether PCI modifies them in coronary artery disease was unknown.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention modify exercise-induced changes in anti-malondialdehyde-LDL antibody levels in patients with severe single vessel coronary artery disease?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention modify exercise-induced changes in anti-malondialdehyde-LDL antibody levels in patients with severe single vessel coronary artery disease?
PCI does not alter the acute reduction in anti-oxLDL antibodies induced by exercise in patients with stable single-vessel coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PCI does not modify exercise-induced anti-MDA-LDL changes; confirms revascularization leaves acute oxidative responses unaltered in stable single-vessel CAD.
Aim: Malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) forms a significant component of oxidised LDL. The effects of exercise on levels of MDA-LDL and anti-MDA-LDL antibodies are not well-understood. Furthermore, it is not known whether these can be modified in patients with coronary artery disease by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: The Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation with optimal medical Therapy of Angioplasty in stable angina (ORBITA) trial was the first blinded, multi-centre randomised trial of PCI vs. placebo procedure for angina relief. Serum samples were available at four time-points: pre-randomisation pre- (P1) and post- (P2) exercise and post-randomisation (6-weeks following the PCI or placebo procedure), pre- (P3) and post- (P4) exercise. ELISAs were performed using laboratory-developed assays for MDA-LDL (adjusted for Apolipoprotein B) and anti-MDA-LDL antibodies. Results: One hundred ninety-six of the 200 patients (age 66.1 [SD 8.99] years, 28% female) with severe single vessel coronary artery disease suitable for PCI enrolled in the ORBITA trial had blood available for analysis. With exercise at pre-randomisation (P2–P1) there was no significant change in adjusted MDA-LDL (−0.001, 95% CI −0.004 to 0.001; p = 0.287); however, IgG and IgM anti-MDA-LDL significantly declined (−0.022, 95% CI −0.029 to −0.014, p < 0.0001; −0.016, 95% CI −0.024 to −0.008, p = 0.0002, respectively). PCI did not have a significant impact on either the pre-exercise values (P3 controlling for P1) of MDA-LDL ( p = 0.102), IgG ( p = 0.444) or IgM anti-MDA-LDL ( p = 0.909). Nor did PCI impact the exercise induced changes in these markers (P4 controlling for P1, P2, and P3) for MDA-LDL ( p = 0.605), IgG ( p = 0.725) or IgM anti-MDA-LDL ( p = 0.171). Pre-randomisation ischaemia on stress echo did not impact these interactions. Conclusions: Exercise results in an acute reduction in anti-oxLDL antibodies in patients with severe single vessel coronary disease, possibly indicating an induction in homoeostatic clearance via the innate immune system. However, PCI did not ameliorate this effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartley et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: