Why the study?
Does mid-myocardial pacing reduce transmural dispersion of repolarization and prevent ventricular arrhythmias compared to epicardial pacing in canine left ventricular wedge preparations?
Does mid-myocardial pacing reduce transmural dispersion of repolarization and prevent ventricular arrhythmias compared to epicardial pacing in canine left ventricular wedge preparations?
Mid-myocardial pacing reduces transmural dispersion of repolarization and prevents ventricular arrhythmias compared to epicardial pacing in a canine model, suggesting a potential antiarrhythmic benefit of this pacing site.
Hypothesis-generating for mid-myocardial pacing to reduce repolarization dispersion; clinical translation requires prospective human studies.
INTRODUCTION: Epicardial (Epi) activation of the left ventricular (LV) wall increases transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR), which creates a substrate for the development of ventricular arrhythmia. We hypothesize that pacing from the LV mid-myocardium may decrease the TDR and occurrence of arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: A transmural electrocardiogram and transmembrane action potentials were simultaneously recorded from Epi, mid-myocardial (M), and endocardial (Endo) layers of the arterially perfused canine LV wedge preparations (n= 8). Transmural dispersion of repolarization varied when the preparations were paced at each layer, respectively (Endo pacing, 35.6 ± 6.6 ms; M pacing, 34.9 ± 7.3 ms; Epi pacing, 72.4 ± 4.9 ms; P< 0.001). A significant difference was noted in TDR between M pacing and Epi pacing (P< 0.001), but not between M pacing and Endo pacing (P= 0.831). This result was reproducible in the presence of ischaemia-reperfusion experiments (n= 8). Transmural dispersion of repolarization was amplified as compared with non-ischaemic experiments and differed when preparations were paced at each layer (Endo pacing, 62.8 ± 13.8 ms; M pacing, 63.3 ± 13.3 ms; Epi pacing, 111.1 ± 17.7 ms; P< 0.001). There was again no significant difference between Endo pacing and M pacing (P= 0.948). However, as pacing was shifted from M to Epi, there was a significant increase in TDR (P< 0.001). Ventricular arrhythmias were induced in two of eight ischaemic preparations during Epi pacing, but did not occur in either M or Endo pacing. CONCLUSION: Mid-myocardial pacing can significantly decrease the TDR and prevent the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias as compared with Epi pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: