Key result
LV epicardial and BiV pacing prolongs TDR by ~76% vs RV endocardial pacing in dogs.
Why the study?
The effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on myocardial repolarization and potential proarrhythmic risk are not well understood.
Does LV-Epi and Bi-V pacing increase transmural dispersion of repolarization compared to RV-Endo pacing in canine models?
Does LV-Epi and Bi-V pacing increase transmural dispersion of repolarization compared to RV-Endo pacing in canine models?
Left ventricular epicardial and biventricular pacing increase transmural dispersion of repolarization in canine models, suggesting a potential mechanism for proarrhythmic risk associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May signal proarrhythmic risk with LV epicardial pacing in CRT; leaves open translation from healthy canine models to clinical populations.
BACKGROUND: Benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are well established. However, less is understood concerning its effects on myocardial repolarization and the potential proarrhythmic risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Healthy dogs (n = 8) were compared to a long QT interval (LQT) model (n = 8, induced by cesium chloride, CsCl) and a dilated cardiomyopathy with congestive heart failure (DCM-CHF, induced by rapid ventricular pacing, n = 5). Monophasic action potential (MAP) recordings were obtained from the subendocardium, midmyocardium, subepicardium, and the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) was calculated. The QT interval and the interval from the peak to the end of the T wave (T(p-e)) were measured. All these characteristics were compared during left ventricular epicardial (LV-Epi), right ventricular endocardial (RV-Endo), and biventricular (Bi-V) pacing. In healthy dogs, TDR prolonged to 37.54 ms for Bi-V pacing and to 47.16 ms for LV-Epi pacing as compared to 26.75 ms for RV-Endo pacing (P < 0.001), which was parallel to an augmentation in T(p-e) interval (Bi-V pacing, 64.29 ms; LV-Epi pacing, 57.89 ms; RV-Endo pacing, 50.29 ms; P < 0.01). During CsCl exposure, Bi-V and LV-Epi pacing prolonged MAPD, TDR, and T(p-e) interval as compared to RV-Endo pacing. The midmyocardial MAPD (276.30 ms vs 257.35 ms, P < 0.0001) and TDR (33.80 ms vs 27.58 ms, P=0.002) were significantly longer in DCM-CHF dogs than those in healthy dogs. LV-Epi and Bi-V pacing further prolonged the MAPD and TDR in this model. CONCLUSIONS: LV-Epi and Bi-V pacing result in prolongation of ventricular repolarization time, and increase of TDR accounted for a parallel augmentation of the T(p-e) interval, which provides evidence that T(p-e) interval accurately represents TDR. These effects are magnified in the LQT and DCM-CHF canine models in addition to their intrinsic transmural heterogeneity in the intact heart. This mechanism may contribute to the development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias, such as torsades de pointes (TdP) in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients treated with CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2005) studied Healthy, long QT interval, and dilated cardiomyopathy with congestive heart failure (n=21). Left ventricular epicardial (LV-Epi) and biventricular (Bi-V) pacing vs. Right ventricular endocardial (RV-Endo) pacing was evaluated on Transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) (p=< 0.001). Left ventricular epicardial and biventricular pacing prolonged transmural dispersion of repolarization compared to right ventricular endocardial pacing in healthy dogs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: