Why the study?
Does the estimation of visceral/ectopic fat deposition via imaging techniques improve cardiovascular risk assessment compared to traditional CVD risk factors in patients with impaired glycemic control or type 2 diabetes?
Does the estimation of visceral/ectopic fat deposition via imaging techniques improve cardiovascular risk assessment compared to traditional CVD risk factors in patients with impaired glycemic control or type 2 diabetes?
Estimating visceral and ectopic fat deposition via imaging may improve cardiovascular risk stratification beyond traditional risk factors and BMI.
May support ectopic fat imaging for refined T2D risk stratification; leaves open incremental value over traditional factors in prospective studies.
Although excess body fat is a significant health hazard, estimation of body fat content with the body mass index may not adequately reflect the amount of atherogenic adipose tissue (AT), i.e. visceral and ectopic fat. As opposed to subcutaneous AT that supposedly acts as a metabolic sink buffering excess dietary energy, visceral or intra-abdominal AT depots respond to several external stimuli that trigger lipolysis and secretion of free fatty acids (FFAs). Reaching the liver, FFAs accumulate in the liver and, over time, promote a chronic condition known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The liver of the typical NAFLD patient secretes large amounts of very-low-density lipoproteins, the lipid content of which may accumulate in additional organs (skeletal muscle, heart, and pancreas). Here, we review the evidence emerging from functional and population studies that point towards an important role of ectopic fat accumulation in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. We conclude that although patients with impaired glycemic control or type 2 diabetes are at increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, estimating cardiovascular risk goes wellbeyond the assessment of glycemic control and traditional CVD risk factors, and the estimation of visceral/ectopic fat deposition via readily available imaging techniquesshould be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arsenault et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: