Key result
Ouabain enhanced proarrhythmic spontaneous Ca2+ activity and hypercontraction in NCX overexpressor myocytes compared to wild-type, without altering the positive inotropic effect.
Increased NCX expression enhances the proarrhythmic but not inotropic effects of cardiac glycosides, potentially explaining the lack of prognostic benefit of digitalis in heart failure.
Administration of digitalis in heart failure ( HF ) increases quality of life but does not carry a prognostic benefit. Digitalis is an indirect inhibitor of the Na + /Ca 2+ exchanger ( NCX ), which is overexpressed in HF . We therefore used the cardiac glycoside ouabain in Ca 2+ imaging experiments and patch‐clamp experiments in isolated ventricular myocytes from nonfailing transgenic NCX overexpressor mice ( OE ). In field‐stimulated myocytes, ouabain (1–100 μ m ) increased the amplitude of the Ca 2+ transient in OE and wild‐type ( WT ) similarly. Ouabain‐mediated spontaneous Ca 2+ ‐activity was significantly more pronounced in OE compared to WT myocytes at higher concentrations (100 μm). Also, at very high concentrations (1000 μ m ) of ouabain, the number of cells with hypercontraction leading to cell death was higher in OE . Ouabain (10 μ m ) shortened the action potential duration in both genotypes. Our findings suggest that the proarrhythmic but not the inotropic effects of cardiac glycosides are enhanced by increased NCX expression. This may offer an explanation for the observed lack of prognostic benefit but increased quality of life in HF , which is accompanied by NCX upregulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bögeholz et al. (2018) studied Heart failure (contextual). Ouabain vs. Wild-type (WT) myocytes was evaluated on Ca2+ transient amplitude, spontaneous Ca2+ activity, and hypercontraction. Ouabain enhanced proarrhythmic spontaneous Ca2+ activity and hypercontraction in NCX overexpressor myocytes compared to wild-type, without altering the positive inotropic effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: