Key result
Specific IKr activators like HW-0168 effectively alleviated the proarrhythmic effects of carbon monoxide in simulated human hearts, whereas current antiarrhythmic drugs including ranolazine failed to achieve therapeutic effects.
Why the study?
Carbon monoxide induces arrhythmias through direct effects on multiple ion channels distinct from ischemia, urgently requiring effective pharmacotherapies that remain poorly addressed in clinical treatment.
Does pharmacotherapy with antiarrhythmic drugs or IKr activators improve cellular and tissue-level biomarkers in virtual models of CO-induced arrhythmias?
Does pharmacotherapy with antiarrhythmic drugs or IKr activators improve cellular and tissue-level biomarkers in virtual models of CO-induced arrhythmias?
In silico modeling suggests that specific IKr activators, unlike common antiarrhythmic drugs, may be a promising pharmacotherapy for carbon monoxide-induced arrhythmias.
May warrant further study of IKr activators in CO arrhythmias; leaves open clinical translation beyond in silico models.
Background: Carbon monoxide (CO) is gaining increased attention in air pollution-induced arrhythmias. The severe cardiotoxic consequences of CO urgently require effective pharmacotherapy to treat it. However, existing evidence demonstrates that CO can induce arrhythmias by directly affecting multiple ion channels, which is a pathway distinct from heart ischemia and has received less concern in clinical treatment. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of some common clinical antiarrhythmic drugs for CO-induced arrhythmias, and to propose a potential pharmacotherapy for CO-induced arrhythmias through the virtual pathological cell and tissue models. Methods: Two pathological models describing CO effects on healthy and failing hearts were constructed as control baseline models. After this, we first assessed the efficacy of some common antiarrhythmic drugs like ranolazine, amiodarone, nifedipine, etc., by incorporating their ion channel-level effects into the cell model. Cellular biomarkers like action potential duration and tissue-level biomarkers such as the QT interval from pseudo-ECGs were obtained to assess the drug efficacy. In addition, we also evaluated multiple specific I Kr activators in a similar way to multi-channel blocking drugs, as the I Kr activator showed great potency in dealing with CO-induced pathological changes. Results: Simulation results showed that the tested seven antiarrhythmic drugs failed to rescue the heart from CO-induced arrhythmias in terms of the action potential and the ECG manifestation. Some of them even worsened the condition of arrhythmogenesis. In contrast, I Kr activators like HW-0168 effectively alleviated the proarrhythmic effects of CO. Conclusion: Current antiarrhythmic drugs including the ranolazine suggested in previous studies did not achieve therapeutic effects for the cardiotoxicity of CO, and we showed that the specific I Kr activator is a promising pharmacotherapy for the treatment of CO-induced arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2022) studied Carbon monoxide induced arrhythmias. IKr activators (e.g., HW-0168) and multi-channel blockers vs. Baseline models (healthy + CO, HF + CO) was evaluated on Action potential duration and QT interval. Specific IKr activators like HW-0168 effectively alleviated the proarrhythmic effects of carbon monoxide in simulated human hearts, whereas current antiarrhythmic drugs including ranolazine failed to achieve therapeutic effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: