Key result
ED screening misses timely STEMI identification in ~13% of cases, with wide variation across sites.
Why the study?
Do emergency department screening criteria and processes affect the missed case rate for early ECG identification of STEMI in adult patients?
Cohort (n=472,166)
Yes
Do emergency department screening criteria and processes affect the missed case rate for early ECG identification of STEMI in adult patients?
There is significant variability in emergency department STEMI screening performance, and optimizing screening criteria to balance sensitivity and specificity (informedness) may reduce missed cases and diagnostic delays.
ED site variability in missed STEMI cases may reflect screening differences; leaves open whether optimized protocols improve timely identification.
Background Timely diagnosis of ST ‐segment elevation myocardial infarction ( STEMI ) in the emergency department ( ED ) is made solely by ECG . Obtaining this test within 10 minutes of ED arrival is critical to achieving the best outcomes. We investigated variability in the timely identification of STEMI across institutions and whether performance variation was associated with the ED characteristics, the comprehensiveness of screening criteria, and the STEMI screening processes. Methods and Results We examined STEMI screening performance in 7 ED s, with the missed case rate ( MCR ) as our primary end point. The MCR is the proportion of primarily screened ED patients diagnosed with STEMI who did not receive an ECG within 15 minutes of ED arrival. STEMI was defined by hospital discharge diagnosis. Relationships between the MCR and ED characteristics, screening criteria, and STEMI screening processes were assessed, along with differences in door‐to‐ ECG times for captured versus missed patients. The overall MCR for all 7 ED s was 12.8%. The lowest and highest MCR s were 3.4% and 32.6%, respectively. The mean difference in door‐to‐ ECG times for captured and missed patients was 31 minutes, with a range of 14 to 80 minutes of additional myocardial ischemia time for missed cases. The prevalence of primarily screened ED STEMI s was 0.09%. ED s with the greatest informedness (sensitivity+specificity−1) demonstrated superior performance across all other screening measures. Conclusions The 29.2% difference in MCRs between the highest and lowest performing ED s demonstrates room for improving timely STEMI identification among primarily screened ED patients. The MCR and informedness can be used to compare screening across ED s and to understand variable performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yiadom et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=472,166). Emergency department screening criteria for an early ECG was evaluated on Missed case rate (MCR), defined as the proportion of primarily screened ED patients diagnosed with STEMI who did not receive an ECG within 15 minutes of ED arrival (95% CI 9.9-16.4). The overall missed case rate for timely STEMI identification among primarily screened emergency department patients was 12.8%, with a 29.2% difference between the highest and lowest performing sites.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: