Why the study?
How does cardiac systolic and diastolic function change during the progression of normal human pregnancy?
How does cardiac systolic and diastolic function change during the progression of normal human pregnancy?
Normal pregnancy progression to term is associated with increased ventricular wall stress and a deterioration in echocardiographic measures of systolic and diastolic cardiac function.
May support closer monitoring of myocardial function near term; leaves open whether changes predict outcomes in larger cohorts.
The aim of the present study was to undertake a longitudinal study of systolic and diastolic cardiac function during normal pregnancy. At a median of 16 weeks of gestation, 100 primiparous women underwent echocardiography, including tissue Doppler imaging, determining left ventricular mass, cardiac output, systolic and diastolic velocities, and wall stress. A total of 32 were assessed again at a median of 37 weeks of gestation. Non-pregnant control estimates (n=9) were obtained by averaging four separate measures over two menstrual cycles. Initially, the pregnant women had significantly higher pulse rates than controls, associated with greater ventricular wall stress (two-tailed P value=0.015), and systolic (two-tailed P value=0.005) and diastolic (two-tailed P value=0.018) lateral wall myocardial velocities, but no differences in systolic blood pressure, left ventricular mass or cardiac output. By 37 weeks of gestation, increased blood pressure (two-tailed P value<0.001) and left ventricular mass (two-tailed P value=0.002) were associated with a significant increase in ventricular wall stress (two-tailed P value<0.001), and reductions in septal systolic (two-tailed P value=0.004) and septal and lateral early diastolic (two-tailed P value<0.001) myocardial velocities. The diastolic velocities at 37 weeks correlated inversely with maternal weight and age. In conclusion, by term pregnancy, an increase in ventricular wall stress is accompanied by a deterioration in cardiac function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zentner et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: