Key result
Fetal epicardial fat thickness was significantly higher in pregnancies with pregestational (1.47 mm) and gestational diabetes (1.40 mm) compared to normal pregnancies (1.19 mm, p<.001).
Why the study?
To evaluate changes in fetal epicardial fat thickness in pregnancies with PGDM and GDM, and determine its diagnostic effectiveness in differentiating them from normal pregnancies.
Is fetal epicardial fat thickness increased in pregnancies with pregestational and gestational diabetes compared to normal pregnancies?
Observational (n=330)
Is fetal epicardial fat thickness increased in pregnancies with pregestational and gestational diabetes compared to normal pregnancies?
Fetal epicardial fat thickness measured at 29 weeks of gestation is significantly increased in diabetic pregnancies and can accurately differentiate pregestational and gestational diabetes from normal pregnancies.
Fetal EFT may aid differentiation of diabetic pregnancies; leaves open its prognostic utility and clinical adoption pending prospective studies.
Objective To evaluate the changes of fetal epicardial fat thickness (EFT) in pregnancies with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to identify the diagnostic effectiveness of fetal EFT in differentiating PGDM and GDM from normal pregnancies.Methods The study was conducted with pregnant women who admitted to perinatology department between October 2020 and August 2021. Patients were grouped as PGDM (n = 110), GDM (n = 110), and control (n = 110) for comparison of fetal EFT. EFT was measured in all three groups at 29 weeks of gestation. Demographic characteristics and ultrasonographic findings were recorded and compared.Results The mean fetal EFT was significantly higher in PGDM (1.47 ± 0.083 mm, p < .001) and GDM (1.40 ± 0.082 mm, p < .001) groups compared to control group (1.19 ± 0.049 mm) and was also significantly higher in PGDM group than GDM group (p < .001). Fetal EFT was significantly positively correlated with maternal age, fasting, 1st hour, 2nd hour glucose values, HbA1c, fetal abdominal circumference, and deepest vertical pocket of amniotic fluid (p < .001). Fetal EFT value of 1.3 mm diagnosed PGDM patients with a sensitivity of 97.3% and a specificity of 98.2%. Fetal EFT value of 1.27 mm diagnosed GDM patients with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 95%.Conclusions Fetal EFT is greater in pregnancies with diabetes than in normal pregnancies, and also greater in PGDM than in GDM. In addition, fetal EFT is strongly correlated with maternal blood glucose levels in diabetic pregnancies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sever et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus (n=330). Pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus vs. Normal pregnancies was evaluated on Fetal epicardial fat thickness (EFT) (p=<.001). Fetal epicardial fat thickness was significantly higher in pregnancies with pregestational (1.47 mm) and gestational diabetes (1.40 mm) compared to normal pregnancies (1.19 mm, p<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: