Key result
Fetal epicardial fat thickness was significantly higher in pregnancies with pregestational (1.47 mm) and gestational diabetes (1.40 mm) compared to normal pregnancies (1.19 mm, p<0.001).
Why the study?
To evaluate changes in fetal epicardial fat thickness in pregnancies with pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus, and to assess its diagnostic effectiveness in differentiating them from normal pregnancies.
Does maternal pregestational or gestational diabetes increase fetal epicardial fat thickness compared to normal pregnancies?
Observational (n=502)
Does maternal pregestational or gestational diabetes increase fetal epicardial fat thickness compared to normal pregnancies?
Fetal epicardial fat thickness is significantly increased in pregnancies with pregestational and gestational diabetes and strongly correlates with maternal blood glucose levels.
May indicate fetal effects of maternal hyperglycemia; cross-sectional data leave causal and prognostic value open.
Objective: To evaluate the changes of fetal epicardial fat thickness (EFT) in pregnancies with pregestational (PGDM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to identify the diagnostic effectiveness of fetal EFT in differentiating PGDM and GDM from normal pregnancies. Methods: The study was conducted with pregnant women who admitted to perinatology department between November 2020 and September 2022. Patients were analyzed as 3 groups: PGDM (n=161), GDM (n=171) and control group (n=170). EFT was measured in all three groups at 29 weeks of gestation. Demographic characteristics and ultrasonographic findings were recorded and compared. Results: The mean fetal EFT was significantly higher in PGDM (1.47±0.083 mm, p<0.001) and GDM (1.40±0.082 mm, p<0.001) groups compared to control group (1.19±0.049 mm) and was also significantly higher in PGDM group than GDM group (p<0.001). Fetal EFT was significantly positively correlated with maternal age, fasting, 1 st hour, 2 nd hour glucose values, HbA1c, fetal abdominal circumference and deepest vertical pocket of amniotic fluid (p<0.001). Fetal EFT value of 1.3 mm diagnosed PGDM patients with a sensitivity of 97.3% and a specificity of 98.2%. Fetal EFT value of 1.27 mm diagnosed GDM patients with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 95%. Conclusions: Fetal EFT is greater in pregnancies with diabetes than in normal pregnancies, and also greater in PGDM than in GDM. In addition, fetal EFT is strongly correlated with maternal blood glucose levels in diabetic pregnancies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sever et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus (n=502). Fetal epicardial fat thickness (EFT) measurement vs. Normal pregnancies was evaluated on Fetal epicardial fat thickness (EFT) (p=<0.001). Fetal epicardial fat thickness was significantly higher in pregnancies with pregestational (1.47 mm) and gestational diabetes (1.40 mm) compared to normal pregnancies (1.19 mm, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: