PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 26, 2014IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement12 citations

A Pattern-Based Windowed Impulse Rejection Filter for Nonpathological HRV Artifacts Correction

View Full Paper
HOHussein Al OsmanUniversity of OttawaMEMohamad EidNew York University Abu DhabiASAbdulmotaleb El SaddikNew York University Abu Dhabi

Key Result

The pattern-based windowed impulse rejection (PWIR) filter achieved a true detection rate of 93.80% and a false detection rate of 0.66% for HRV artifacts, outperforming existing algorithms.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Heart rate variability (HRV) signals
I
Intervention
Pattern-based windowed impulse rejection (PWIR) filter and interpolation technique
C
Comparator
Existing algorithms including Integral pulse frequency modulation
O
Outcome
True detection rate and false detection rate of nonpathological HRV artifacts

The proposed PWIR filter and interpolation technique provide a highly accurate solution for detecting and correcting nonpathological artifacts in HRV signals.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 93.8% vs 87.62%

Abstract

Artifacts in a heart rate variability (HRV) signal can severely distort the extracted time- and frequency-domain parameters, and thus render the information obtained from the signal potentially unusable. In this paper, we propose an algorithm for nonpathological HRV artifact detection called pattern-based windowed impulse rejection (PWIR) filter. This algorithm extends the windowed impulse rejection filter algorithm, we have introduced in our previous publication. Our performance evaluation demonstrates that PWIR compares favorably with respect to the existing algorithms with a true detection rate of 93.80% and a false detection rate of 0.66%. Integral pulse frequency modulation, the most prominent competing algorithm according to our tests, displays a lower true detection rate (87.62%) and a significantly higher false positive detection rate (4.25%). All other algorithms are shown to be significantly less accurate. We also propose an interpolation technique to replace erroneous samples with new ones. The interpolation technique is shown to produce more accurate sample estimates than several existing ones (in terms of maximizing the accuracy of corrected HRV signals when it comes to time and frequency-domain analysis). The combination of the proposed artifact detection and interpolation methods presented in this paper constitutes a nonpathological artifact correction solution for HRV signals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Osman et al. (2014) studied Heart rate variability (HRV) artifacts. Pattern-based windowed impulse rejection (PWIR) filter vs. Integral pulse frequency modulation and other existing algorithms was evaluated on True detection rate and false detection rate of HRV artifacts. The pattern-based windowed impulse rejection (PWIR) filter achieved a true detection rate of 93.80% and a false detection rate of 0.66% for HRV artifacts, outperforming existing algorithms.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c07614ebd09f3dfa95b15https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2014.2370496
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of methods for removal of ectopy in measurement of heart rate variability1994 · 220 citations
  2. 2A Rough-Set-Based Inference Engine for ECG Classification2006 · 159 citations
  3. 3Hidden Markov Tree Model Applied to ECG Delineation2005 · 63 citations
  4. 4Contribution of tonic vagal modulation of heart rate, central respiratory drive, respiratory depth, and respiratory frequency to respiratory sinus arrhythmia during mental stress and physical exercise2002 · 157 citations
  5. 5Real-Time Correction of Heart Interbeat Intervals2007 · 32 citations