Key result
Novel automated HRV artifact correction limits measurement error to ~2% across standard metrics.
Why the study?
Current artifact correction methods for heart rate variability have limitations that hamper real-life data analysis from personal monitoring devices.
The new algorithm offers a computationally effective way to automatically correct frequent artifacts in continuous wearable HRV data without introducing the significant biases seen with conventional median filters.
May enable automated HRV correction in wearable exercise data; leaves open prospective clinical validation before adoption.
Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis can be a useful tool to detect underlying heart or even general health problems. Currently, such analysis is usually performed in controlled or semi-controlled conditions. Since many of the typical HRV measures are sensitive to data quality, manual artifact correction is common in literature, both as an exclusive method or in addition to various filters. With proliferation of Personal Monitoring Devices with continuous HRV analysis an opportunity opens for HRV analysis in a new setting. However, current artifact correction approaches have several limitations that hamper the analysis of real-life HRV data. To address this issue we propose an algorithm for automated artifact correction that has a minimal impact on HRV measures, but can handle more artifacts than existing solutions. We verify this algorithm based on two datasets. One collected during a recreational bicycle race and another one in a laboratory, both using a PMD in form of a GPS watch. Data include direct measurement of electrical myocardial signals using chest straps and direct measurements of power using a crank sensor (in case of race dataset), both paired with the watch. Early results suggest that the algorithm can correct more artifacts than existing solutions without a need for manual support or parameter tuning. At the same time, the error introduced to HRV measures for peak correction and shorter gaps is similar to the best existing solution (Kubios-inspired threshold-based cubic interpolation) and better than commonly used median filter. For longer gaps, cubic interpolation can in some cases result in lower error in HRV measures, but the shape of the curve it generates matches ground truth worse than our algorithm. It might suggest that further development of the proposed algorithm may also improve these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Królak et al. (2020) studied Recreational cyclists (n=59). Automated artifact correction algorithm for HRV data vs. Median filter and Kubios-inspired threshold-based cubic interpolation was evaluated on Error introduced to typical HRV measures after artifact correction. The proposed automated artifact correction algorithm achieved an error level of approximately 2% in HRV measures, outperforming median filters and handling more artifacts without manual tuning than existing cubic interpolation solutions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: