Key result
A dynamic 2D computer model of radiofrequency catheter ablation incorporating heartbeat-induced electrode displacement computed a lesion depth of 5.86 mm, practically identical to a static model.
Why the study?
Existing computer models of radiofrequency catheter ablation only consider static conditions, lacking the ability to model heartbeat-induced electrode displacements despite detectable contact force changes during clinical procedures.
Does a dynamic RFCA model incorporating heartbeat-induced electrode displacement predict different lesion sizes compared to a static model?
Does a dynamic RFCA model incorporating heartbeat-induced electrode displacement predict different lesion sizes compared to a static model?
A dynamic computer model of radiofrequency ablation incorporating heartbeat-induced electrode displacement predicts lesion sizes nearly identical to a static model using average depth at standard energy settings.
Dynamic RFCA models with heartbeat displacement yield identical lesion depths; leaves open need for in vivo validation before clinical translation.
Background The state of the art in computer modeling of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) only considers a static model, i.e. it does not allow modeling ablation electrode displacements induced by tissue movement due to heartbeats. This feature is theoretically required, since heartbeat-induced changes in contact force can be detected during this clinical procedure. Methods We built a 2D RFCA model coupling electrical, thermal and mechanical problems and simulated a standard energy setting (25 W – 30 s). The mechanical interaction between the ablation electrode and tissue was dynamically modeled to reproduce heartbeat-induced changes in the electrode insertion depth from 0.86 to 2.05 mm, which corresponded with contact forces between 10 and 30 g when cardiac tissue was modeled by a hyperelastic Neo-Hookean model with a Young’s modulus of 75 kPa and Poisson’s ratio of 0.49. Results The dynamic model computed a lesion depth of 5.86 mm, which is within the range of previous experimental results based on a beating heart for a similar energy setting and contact force (5.6−6.7 mm). Lesion size was practically identical (differences less than 0.02 mm) to that using a static model with the electrode inserted to an average depth (1.46 mm, equivalent to 20 g contact force). Conclusions The RFCA dynamic model including heartbeat-induced electrode displacement predicts lesion depth reasonably well compared to previous experimental results based on a beating heart model, however this is true only at a standard energy setting and moderate contact force.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pérez et al. (2021) studied Radiofrequency catheter ablation. Dynamic 2D RFCA model vs. Static model was evaluated on Lesion depth. A dynamic 2D computer model of radiofrequency catheter ablation incorporating heartbeat-induced electrode displacement computed a lesion depth of 5.86 mm, practically identical to a static model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: