Key result
The revised Ghent nosology showed very high agreement with the original Ghent nosology for diagnosing Marfan syndrome in adult Korean patients (κ = 0.94; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.0).
Why the study?
Does the revised Ghent nosology provide high diagnostic agreement with the original Ghent nosology in adult Korean patients with suspected Marfan syndrome?
Observational (n=106)
Does the revised Ghent nosology provide high diagnostic agreement with the original Ghent nosology in adult Korean patients with suspected Marfan syndrome?
The revised Ghent nosology shows excellent agreement with the original Ghent nosology for diagnosing Marfan syndrome in adult Korean patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports revised Ghent nosology in Korean adults; leaves open generalizability to other populations.
Recently, a revised Ghent nosology has been established for the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome (MFS) that puts more weight on the aortic root aneurysm and ectopia lentis. We compared the application of the Ghent and revised Ghent nosologies in adult Korean patients for whom there is suspicion of MFS. From January 1995 to June 2010, we enrolled 106 patients older than 20 years for whom there was suspicion of MFS, and who had undergone genetic analysis of the fibrillin-1 gene (FBN1). Of 106 patients, 86 patients (81%) fulfilled the criteria of the Ghent nosology, and 84 patients (79%) met the criteria of the revised Ghent nosology. The two patients who met the Ghent nosology criteria, but not the criteria of the revised Ghent nosology were diagnosed with Loeys-Dietz syndrome and MASS phenotype. The level of agreement between both nosologies was very high (κ = 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.86 to 1.0). Marfan-like syndromes were diagnosed in 30% (6/20 patients) with negative Ghent and revised Ghent criteria and no FBN1 mutations. These results suggest that adult Korean patients who fulfill the old Ghent criteria almost all fulfill the new criteria for the diagnosis of MFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Marfan syndrome (n=106). Revised Ghent nosology vs. Ghent nosology was evaluated on Diagnosis of Marfan syndrome (κ = 0.94, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.0). The revised Ghent nosology showed very high agreement with the original Ghent nosology for diagnosing Marfan syndrome in adult Korean patients (κ = 0.94; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.0).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: