Key result
The 2010 Ghent criteria increase Marfan syndrome and MVP diagnoses vs 1996 guidelines, boosting MVP detection to ~8%.
Why the study?
The diagnostic yield of Marfan syndrome evaluation and the impact of the 2010 Ghent nosology compared to the 1996 nosology in a specialized outpatient clinic were investigated.
Does the 2010 Ghent nosology improve the diagnostic yield for Marfan syndrome and related disorders compared to the 1996 nosology in adults evaluated at a specialized clinic?
Observational (n=343)
No
Does the 2010 Ghent nosology improve the diagnostic yield for Marfan syndrome and related disorders compared to the 1996 nosology in adults evaluated at a specialized clinic?
The 2010 Ghent nosology increases the diagnostic yield in patients evaluated for Marfan syndrome, primarily by lowering the diagnostic threshold for mitral valve prolapse.
May increase Marfan diagnoses in specialized clinics; leaves open outcome impact and generalizability from observational data.
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is diagnosed according to the Ghent nosology, which has recently been revised. In the Netherlands, evaluation for possible MFS is performed in specialized Marfan outpatient clinics. We investigated the diagnostic yield in our clinic and the impact of the 2010 nosology. All adult patients (n = 343) who visited our clinic between 1998 and 2008 were included. We analyzed their reasons for referral, characteristics, and established diagnoses. In addition, we applied the 2010 nosology to all patients and compared the outcomes to those obtained with the 1996 nosology. Diagnoses that were made using the 1996 and the 2010 Ghent nosology included MFS (44/343 vs. 47/343), familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or dissection (22/343 vs. 22/343 patients), Loeys-Dietz syndrome (4/343 vs. 4/343 patients), and (familial) mitral valve prolapse (MVPS; 5/343 vs. 28/343 patients). In both nosologies, 77% of MFS patients had an FBN1 mutation. The 2010 nosology led to an increase in the number of diagnoses made: 4 additional cases of MFS were identified (one patient was "lost" who no longer fulfilled the criteria) and 23 additional cases of MVPS were diagnosed. The diagnostic yield of patients with aortic root dilatation was 65% using the 1996 nosology and 70% using the 2010 nosology. The change in diagnoses did not lead to a difference in clinical follow-up. We conclude that the diagnostic yield of our specialized clinic was high, in particular in patients with aortic root dilatation. Further more the 2010 Ghent nosology led to a significant increase in the number of diagnoses made, mainly due to lowering of the diagnostic threshold for MVPS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aalberts et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Possible Marfan syndrome (n=343). 2010 Ghent nosology vs. 1996 Ghent nosology was evaluated on Diagnosis of Marfan syndrome. Application of the 2010 Ghent nosology compared to the 1996 criteria increased the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome (13.7% vs 12.8%) and mitral valve prolapse (8.2% vs 1.5%) in evaluated adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: