Key result
A combined MRI and inverse potential mapping method localized the site of earliest epicardial depolarization with an accuracy of 6.0 ± 1.9 mm in patients with an MRI-conditional pacemaker.
Why the study?
Does non-invasive inverse potential mapping combined with MRI accurately localize ventricular paced beats in patients with MRI-conditional pacemakers?
Observational (n=10)
Single-blind
Yes
Does non-invasive inverse potential mapping combined with MRI accurately localize ventricular paced beats in patients with MRI-conditional pacemakers?
Non-invasive inverse potential mapping combined with MRI is feasible and can localize epicardial breakthrough of ventricular paced beats with an accuracy of 6.0 ± 1.9 mm.
BACKGROUND: With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditional pacemaker systems, the possibility of performing MRI in pacemaker patients has been introduced. Besides for the detailed evaluation of atrial and ventricular volumes and function, MRI can be used in combination with body surface potential mapping (BSPM) in a non-invasive inverse potential mapping (IPM) strategy. In non-invasive IPM, epicardial potentials are reconstructed from recorded body surface potentials (BSP). In order to investigate whether an IPM method with a limited number of electrodes could be used for the purpose of non-invasive focus localization, it was applied in patients with implanted pacing devices. Ventricular paced beats were used to simulate ventricular ectopic foci. METHODS: Ten patients with an MRI-conditional pacemaker system and a structurally normal heart were studied. Patient-specific 3D thorax volume models were reconstructed from the MRI images. BSP were recorded during ventricular pacing. Epicardial potentials were inversely calculated from the BSP. The site of epicardial breakthrough was compared to the position of the ventricular lead tip on MRI and the distance between these points was determined. RESULTS: For all patients, the site of earliest epicardial depolarization could be identified. When the tip of the pacing lead was implanted in vicinity to the epicardium, i.e. right ventricular (RV) apex or RV outflow tract, the distance between lead tip position and epicardial breakthrough was 6.0 ± 1.9 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the combined MRI and IPM method is clinically applicable and can identify sites of earliest depolarization with a clinically useful accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graaf et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Patients with an MRI-conditional pacemaker system (n=10). Combined MRI and Inverse Potential Mapping (IPM) vs. Actual ventricular lead tip position on MRI was evaluated on Distance between lead tip position and epicardial breakthrough (localization error). A combined MRI and inverse potential mapping method localized the site of earliest epicardial depolarization with an accuracy of 6.0 ± 1.9 mm in patients with an MRI-conditional pacemaker.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: