Why the study?
Does two weeks of hospitalization compared to three weeks of hospitalization maintain safety and survival in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction?
Does two weeks of hospitalization compared to three weeks of hospitalization maintain safety and survival in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-term follow-up confirms that a two-week hospital stay is as safe as a three-week stay for patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.
Long-term follow-up was obtained on 138 patients who participated in a prospective, randomized study comparing two weeks with three weeks of hospitalization following uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. Follow-up information was available on 123 (89%) of all randomized patients. The mean follow-up period was 35 months for those patients who died and 99 months for those who survived. No differences were found between the two groups with respect to survival, cardiac-related deaths, frequency or severity of angina pectoris, subsequent myocardial infarction, incidence of congestive heart failure, number of ventricular aneurysms, or subsequent medical therapy. A significantly greater number of survivors in both groups stopped smoking and had a normal initial heart size than those who died. This long-term follow-up study further supports the conclusions of earlier short-term studies that two weeks of hospitalization is safe in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baughman et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: