Key result
The PEER-HD mentor training program for hemodialysis patients was feasible and acceptable (mean scores 3.43-3.93 out of 4), although post-program knowledge uptake was not statistically significant.
Why the study?
The feasibility, efficacy, and acceptability of the PEER-HD mentor training program needed to be evaluated within a multicenter study testing peer mentorship to reduce hospitalizations in hemodialysis patients.
Does the PEER-HD mentor training program improve knowledge and self-efficacy in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis?
Does the PEER-HD mentor training program improve knowledge and self-efficacy in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis?
p-value: p=0.2
A peer mentor training program for hemodialysis patients was found to be feasible and highly acceptable, though it did not significantly improve knowledge scores.
Peer mentor training appears feasible in hemodialysis but should not yet change practice; leaves open impact on knowledge and self-efficacy.
Rationale and Objective: The 'PEER-HD' multicenter study tests the effectiveness of peer mentorship to reduce hospitalizations in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. In this study, we describe the feasibility, efficacy, and acceptability of the mentor training program. Study Design: Educational program evaluation including the following aspects: (1) description of training content, (2) quantitative analysis of feasibility and acceptability of the program, and (3) quantitative pre-post analysis of efficacy of the training to impart knowledge and self-efficacy. Setting and Participants: Data were collected using baseline clinical and sociodemographic questionnaires from mentor participants enrolled in Bronx, NY, and Nashville, TN, themselves receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Analytical Approach: The outcome variables were the following: (1) feasibility measured by training module attendance and completion, (2) efficacy of the program to impart knowledge and self-efficacy measured by kidney knowledge and self-efficacy surveys, and (3) acceptability as measured by an 11-item survey of trainer performance and module content. Results: = 0.2). Program evaluation assessments of acceptability were favorable [mean of all patient scores (0-4) within each module ranged from 3.43-3.93]. Limitations: Small sample size. Conclusions: The PEER-HD mentor training program required accommodation to patients' schedules but was feasible. Participants rated the program favorably, and although the comparison of performance on knowledge assessments post- and pre-program showed uptake of knowledge, this was not statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golestaneh et al. (2023) studied Maintenance hemodialysis. PEER-HD mentor training program vs. Pre-training baseline was evaluated on Feasibility, efficacy (knowledge and self-efficacy), and acceptability (p=0.2). The PEER-HD mentor training program for hemodialysis patients was feasible and acceptable (mean scores 3.43-3.93 out of 4), although post-program knowledge uptake was not statistically significant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: