Key result
Adding tolvaptan in hospitalized HF with hyponatremia increases annual costs by ~19.5 million THB.
Why the study?
Tolvaptan is used as add-on therapy for heart failure patients with volume overload and hyponatremia, but concerns remain regarding its cost.
Does adding tolvaptan 30 mg daily to standard treatment reduce the total budget impact in hospitalized heart failure patients with hyponatremia?
Does adding tolvaptan 30 mg daily to standard treatment reduce the total budget impact in hospitalized heart failure patients with hyponatremia?
Effect estimate: NBI 19.5 million THB
Adding tolvaptan 30 mg daily to standard care for hospitalized HF patients with hyponatremia in Thailand reduces length of stay but results in a positive net budget impact, requiring a 25.5% price reduction to become cost-saving.
May increase Thai HF budgets despite shorter stays; leaves open cost-saving potential after ~25% price reduction.
Objective: Tolvaptan is used as an add-on therapy for heart failure (HF) patients with volume overload, particularly those with hyponatremia (HN), but its cost raises concern. This study aimed to estimate the budget impact of adding 30 mg of tolvaptan to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone in hospitalized HF patients with HN in Thailand. Methods: A budget impact analysis (BIA) model was developed in accordance with Thai Health Technology Assessment guidelines from the payer's perspective. Epidemiological data on HF in Thailand were used to estimate the target population. Clinical effectiveness data were derived from the EVEREST trial. Cost components included tolvaptan acquisition and HF-related hospitalization costs. Cost data were sourced from the National Health Security Office. The net budget impact (NBI) was calculated as the difference in total budget between standard care with tolvaptan and standard care alone. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impact of key variables. Results: The total budget without tolvaptan was 201 million THB (5,802,973 USD), increasing to 221 million THB (6,365,607 USD) with tolvaptan, resulting in an NBI of 19.5 million THB (562,634 USD) or 1117 THB (32 USD) per member. Despite higher drug costs, tolvaptan use reduced hospitalization costs (4.2 million USD vs 5.8 million USD) due to fewer HF hospitalization days and length of stay reduction. A lower tolvaptan dose, reduced HN risk, or a daily cost reduction of at least 25.5% could result in a negative NBI. Conclusion: Although tolvaptan reduced hospital length of stay, its use at 30 mg daily still led to a positive NBI. These findings are relevant for Thailand and similar healthcare systems considering tolvaptan adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Permsuwan et al. (2025) studied Heart failure with hyponatremia (n=17,488). Tolvaptan vs. Standard treatment alone was evaluated on Net budget impact (NBI) (NBI 19.5 million THB). Adding 30 mg of tolvaptan daily to standard treatment for hospitalized heart failure patients with hyponatremia resulted in a positive net budget impact of 19.5 million THB (562,634 USD) per year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: