Why the study?
Does 3-D spatial precision of local activation direction discriminate atrial fibrillation from regular atrial rhythms?
Does 3-D spatial precision of local activation direction discriminate atrial fibrillation from regular atrial rhythms?
3-D spatial precision of local activation direction effectively discriminates atrial fibrillation from regular atrial rhythms, whereas 2-D precision does not.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports 3-D mapping development for AF discrimination; leaves open clinical validation before practice change.
This study tests the hypothesis that atrial fibrillation (AFib) can be discriminated from regular atrial rhythms by a measure of the variation in local activation direction. Human endocardial atrial recordings of AFib, sinus rhythm, atrial flutter, and supraventricular tachycardia were collected using a catheter with orthogonally placed electrodes, and the direction of each activation was calculated using methods previously described by our laboratory. Each recording was divided into segments containing 100 activations, and the spatial precision for each segment was calculated in three dimensions, as well as in each of the three two-dimensional (2-D) planes. The three-dimensional (3-D) spatial precision for 1161 segments of AFib in 11 recordings ranged from 0.09-0.85 (mean = 0.45), whereas the spatial precision for 138 segments of regular rhythms in 28 recordings was > or = 0.91 in all but four instances. The 2-D spatial precision values overlapped for all rhythms. The results indicate that 3-D spatial precision of local activation direction is a useful discriminator of AFib.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoenwald et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: