Why the study?
Does measuring spatial precision of local activation direction differentiate atrial fibrillation from regular atrial rhythms?
Does measuring spatial precision of local activation direction differentiate atrial fibrillation from regular atrial rhythms?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spatial precision of local activation direction using short segment lengths shows promise as an accurate method to discriminate atrial fibrillation from regular atrial rhythms.
Discusses measuring local activation direction variability using short segment lengths to quickly differentiate fibrillation from regular rhythms. It is concluded that the spatial precision of local activation direction shows promise as a potential discriminator of atrial fibrillation from regular atrial rhythms. For the authors' study set, excellent discrimination of atrial fibrillation from regular rhythms was achieved by spatial precision using segment lengths as short as 20 activations. The authors would expect that this method would be even more accurate using permanently implanted electrodes and could be implemented in real-time using four-electrode elements, and may be applicable in the ventricle as well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoenwald et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: