Why the study?
Does a Polar heart rate monitor accurately measure heart rate compared to Holter monitoring and radial pulse palpation in exercising cardiac rehabilitation patients?
Does a Polar heart rate monitor accurately measure heart rate compared to Holter monitoring and radial pulse palpation in exercising cardiac rehabilitation patients?
The Polar heart rate monitor provides an accurate and low-cost method for assessing exercise intensity in cardiac rehabilitation patients, outperforming intermittent radial pulse measurement.
Polar monitors may support accurate exercise intensity assessment in cardiac rehab; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation before practice change.
Objective: To assess the accuracy of a Polar heart rate monitor in measuring heart rate in exercising cardiac rehabilitation patients. Design: Simultaneous heart rate recordings comparing results from the Polar monitor with those from Holter monitoring and intermittent pulse rate as measured by radial artery palpation. Setting: Exercise sessions in a community-based cardiac rehabilitation centre. Patients: Twenty phase III cardiac rehabilitation patients recovering from an acute cardiac event. Main outcome measures: Comparison of heart rates recorded by the two systems and by pulse rate measurement. Results: The Polar monitor gave results very similar to those from Holter monitoring. Intermittent pulse rate measurement gave a limited and less accurate view of the intensity of the exercise session. Conclusion: The Polar heart rate monitor gives accurate readings during cardiac rehabilitation exercise sessions at low cost. It is a useful tool which allows assessment of exercise intensity which is not available from intermittent radial pulse rate measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bethell et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: