Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of digital multidisciplinary conferences (MDCs) in preventing imaging-related quality management (QM) events during the coronavirus-disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. COVID-19 challenged interdisciplinary exchange and QM measures for patient safety. Regular MDCs between radiologists and intensive care unit (ICU) physicians, introduced in our hospital in 2018, enable re-evaluation of imaging examinations and bilateral feedback. MDC protocols from 2020 to 2021 were analysed regarding imaging-related QM events. Epidemiological data on COVID-19 were matched with MDCs. 333 MDCs including 1324 radiological examinations in 857 patients (median age = 64 (IQR = 55-73) years, 66.7% male) were analysed. MDCs were held within a median of 1 day after imaging (IQR = 1-3). QM events were identified in 2.7% (n = 36/1324) of examinations. This represented a significant decrease compared to a control group from 2018/2019 (QM events identified in 14.0%, p < 0.001). QM incidence remained consistent in the pandemic cohort (regression coefficient estimate = -0.01, 95% confidence interval = [0.000, 0.000], p = 0.68). 81% (n = 29/36) of QM events were report-related, 19% process-related (n = 6/36), and 2.8% indication-related (n = 1/36). In 7.3% (n = 97/1324) of examinations, the patient was affected by COVID-19. With MDCs as an effective feedback mechanism in place, the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic led to no increase in QM incidence. Notably, COVID status did not impact QM event occurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muench et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: