Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When discussing quantum ontology, the debate has recently focused on comparing and contrasting wavefunction realism and its rivals. Among them one finds the primitive ontology approach, which is often conflated with the local beables program. In this paper I wish to clarify what I take to be the distinction between the notion of primitive ontology and the one of local beable. I argue that the primitive ontology is the local beable which allows for a dynamical, constructive explanation which preserves symmetries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valia Allori (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: