Key result
A mathematical model of dual AV nodal conduction accurately predicted pathway conduction and showed SP ablation significantly increased mean HH interval during atrial fibrillation (204 to 274 ms, P<0.05).
Absolute Event Rate: 274% vs 204%
p-value: p=<0.05
A novel mathematical model accurately predicts dual AV nodal pathway conduction and demonstrates the differential effects of slow versus fast pathway ablation on ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.
Supports AV nodal modeling for AF rate control; leaves open human validation of ablation effects.
Dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway physiology is described as two different wave fronts that propagate from the atria to the His bundle: one with a longer effective refractory period [fast pathway (FP)] and a second with a shorter effective refractory period [slow pathway (SP)]. By using His electrogram alternance, we have developed a mathematical model of AV conduction that incorporates dual AV nodal pathway physiology. Experiments were performed on five rabbit atrial-AV nodal preparations to develop and test the presented model. His electrogram alternances from the inferior margin of the His bundle were used to identify fast and slow wave front propagations. The ability to predict AV conduction time and the interaction between FP and SP wave fronts have been analyzed during regular and irregular atrial rhythms (e.g., atrial fibrillation). In addition, the role of dual AV nodal pathway wave fronts in the generation of Wenckebach periodicities has been illustrated. Finally, AV node ablative modifications have been evaluated. The model accurately reproduced interactions between FP and SP during regular and irregular atrial pacing protocols. In all experiments, specificity and sensitivity higher than 85% were obtained in the prediction of the pathway responsible for conduction. It has been shown that, during atrial fibrillation, the SP ablation significantly increased the mean HH interval (204 ± 39 vs. 274 ± 50 ms, P < 0.05), whereas FP ablation did not produce significant slowing of ventricular rate. The presented mathematical model can help in understanding some of the intriguing AV node mechanisms and should be considered as a step forward in the studies of AV nodal conduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Climent et al. (2011) studied Dual AV nodal pathway physiology (n=5). Slow pathway (SP) ablation vs. Baseline / Fast pathway (FP) ablation was evaluated on Mean HH interval during atrial fibrillation (p=<0.05). A mathematical model of dual AV nodal conduction accurately predicted pathway conduction and showed SP ablation significantly increased mean HH interval during atrial fibrillation (204 to 274 ms, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: