Key result
AI model identifies LVEF <50% from ECG images with an AUC of ~0.92.
Why the study?
Most algorithms predicting ejection fraction from ECGs require raw signal data, so the authors evaluated whether a neural network could identify left ventricular dysfunction using readily available ECG trace images.
Does a deep-learning model using ECG images accurately detect left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <50%) in a general patient population?
Cross-Sectional (n=104,697)
Yes
Does a deep-learning model using ECG images accurately detect left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <50%) in a general patient population?
Odds Ratio: 31.7 (95% CI 27.46–36.38)
A deep-learning model utilizing standard 12-lead ECG images can accurately screen for left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <50%), offering a scalable and accessible diagnostic tool for resource-constrained settings.
May support ECG-image AI for accessible LVEF screening; extends signal-based algorithms but leaves open prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: The capability to accurately predict the ejection fraction (EF) from an electrocardiogram (ECG) holds significant and valuable clinical implications. Various algorithms based on ECG images are currently being evaluated, with most methods requiring raw signal data from ECG devices. In this study, our objective was to train and validate a neural network on a readily available ECG trace image graph to determine the presence or absence of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). METHODS: 12-lead ECG trace images paired with their echocardiogram reports performed on the same day were selected. A DenseNet121 model, using ECG images as input, was trained to identify EF <50 %. and then externally validated. RESULTS: 1,19,281 ECG-echocardiogram pairs were used for model development. The model demonstrated comparable performance in both the internal test data and external validation data. The area under receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves were 0.92 and 0.78, respectively, for the internal test data and 0.88 and 0.74, respectively, for the external validation data. The model accurately identified more than 85 % of cases with EF <50 % in both datasets. CONCLUSIONS: Actual images of ECGs with simple pre-processing and model architecture can be used as a reliable tool to screen for LVD. The use of images expands the reach of these algorithms to geographies with resource and technological limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swamy et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular dysfunction (n=104,697). DenseNet121 deep-learning model using 12-lead ECG trace images vs. Echocardiogram (biplane method of disk summation) was evaluated on Identification of ejection fraction < 50% (OR 31.7, 95% CI 27.46-36.38). A deep-learning model using ECG trace images accurately identified left ventricular ejection fraction <50% with an area under the ROC curve of 0.92 and a diagnostic odds ratio of 31.7.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: