Key result
Protocol outlines planned cohort study assessing gender-related diagnostic inertia and cardiovascular outcomes.
Why the study?
Objectives for detecting and controlling cardiovascular risk factors are not being effectively met, and outcomes differ between men and women.
Does diagnostic inertia and gender influence the incidence of cardiovascular events in adults with cardiovascular risk factors?
Cohort
Single-blind
Yes
Does diagnostic inertia and gender influence the incidence of cardiovascular events in adults with cardiovascular risk factors?
This study protocol outlines an approach to evaluate gender-related differences in diagnostic inertia for cardiovascular risk factors and its impact on cardiovascular events.
No immediate clinical guidance; protocol leaves open whether gender-related diagnostic inertia affects cardiovascular events.
Evidence shows that objectives for detecting and controlling cardiovascular risk factors are not being effectively met, and moreover, outcomes differ between men and women. This study will assess the gender-related differences in diagnostic inertia around the three most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors: dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, and to evaluate the consequences on cardiovascular disease incidence. This is an epidemiological and cohort study. Eligible patients will be adults who presented to public primary health care centers in a Spanish region from 2008 to 2011, with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or/and diabetes and without cardiovascular disease. Participants' electronic health records will be used to collect the study variables in a window of six months from inclusion. Diagnostic inertia of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and/or diabetes is defined as the registry of abnormal diagnostic parameters-but no diagnosis-on the person's health record. The cohort will be followed from the date of inclusion until the end of 2019. Outcomes will be cardiovascular events, defined as hospital admission due to ischemic cardiopathy, stroke, and death from any cause. The results of this study could inform actions to rectify the structure, organization and training of health care teams in order to correct the inequality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carratalá‐Munuera et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular risk factors (dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Diagnostic inertia vs. No diagnostic inertia was evaluated on First occurrence of a cardiovascular event (hospital admission due to ischemic cardiopathy, stroke, and death from any cause). This paper is a study protocol outlining a planned cohort study to assess the impact of gender-related differences in diagnostic inertia on cardiovascular events, and therefore contains no clinical results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: