Key result
Telemonitoring for COPD and heart failure was assessed by 50 stakeholders, revealing a weak and inconsistent evidence base with insufficient cost-effectiveness studies for routine implementation.
Why the study?
Does telemonitoring fulfill the principles of monitoring and is it ready for implementation into routine settings for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure?
Does telemonitoring fulfill the principles of monitoring and is it ready for implementation into routine settings for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure?
Telemonitoring for COPD and heart failure currently lacks a strong evidence base and struggles with implementation into routine clinical and patient environments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against routine telemonitoring for COPD and heart failure; leaves open the need for stronger cost-effectiveness evidence.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence base for telemonitoring designed for patients who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure, and to assess whether telemonitoring fulfils the principles of monitoring and is ready for implementation into routine settings. DESIGN: Qualitative data collection using interviews and participation in a multi-path mapping process. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six purposively selected informants completed semi-structured interviews and 24 individuals with expertise in the relevant clinical and informatics domains from academia, industry, policy and provider organizations and participated in a multi-path mapping workshop. RESULTS: The evidence base for the effectiveness of telemonitoring is weak and inconsistent, with insufficient cost-effectiveness studies. When considered against an accepted definition of monitoring, telemonitoring is found wanting. Telemonitoring has not been able so far to ensure that the technologies fit into the life world of the patient and into the clinical and organizational milieu of health service delivery systems. CONCLUSIONS: To develop effective telemonitoring for patients with chronic disease, more attention needs to be given to agreeing the central aim of early detection and, to ensure potential implementation, engaging a wide range of stakeholders in the design process, especially patients and clinicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elwyn et al. (2011) studied Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure (n=50). Telemonitoring was evaluated on Evidence base for effectiveness and readiness for implementation. Telemonitoring for COPD and heart failure was assessed by 50 stakeholders, revealing a weak and inconsistent evidence base with insufficient cost-effectiveness studies for routine implementation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: